Nate, Still Great?
It’s Oklahoma City. It’s not the Seattle SuperSonics. They’re gone, and they’ve changed locations and it’s a total different franchise. I’ve been away from Seattle for four years now, so I’m kind of past missing that situation. It is a little different that we’re not going to Seattle to play. But this has happened before. Teams in our league, they move, they change. And this situation here doesn’t feel strange or different.-Nate McMillan, to the Daily Oklahoman, February, 2009
The above comes courtesy of a commenter in a story from the weekend, and, after reading it, it leaves me, not surprisingly, with the sort of conflicting emotions normally reserved for a hated boss getting fired, or a Karl Malone paternity suit.
You see, if you’ve read this website for more than a week you’ll know that the three of us worship almost no person affiliated with the Seattle Sonics more than Nate McMillan. As a player, McMillan always gave more than his statistics indicated, and we ate it up like hungry orphans on a soup line.
His divorce from the Sonics was messy, no doubt. Fueled by resentment over his treatment by Howard Schultz – an emotion shared by many of us, from fans to co-owners to fellow employees – McMillan left the Emerald City for Portland with more baggage than what he put into the moving van. I’m not Bob Newhart - or Frasier Crane, for that matter - but it doesn’t take a trained psychoanalyst to figure out that Nate was peeved at being shown less than top-level treatment from the only franchise he had known as a professional athlete and coach.
Perhaps, just perhaps, at that point McMillan became a professional, in the true sense of the word, with no emotional ties to the city in which he resided. It’s the logical position to take for a man in his chosen profession – coaches are, famously, hired to be fired. As brightly as his star shines in Portland today, he knows he is merely one 37-win season away from being an assistant coach in Charlotte.
There is more to the story, of course. Sonic fans remember well how George Karl minced no words in showing his displeasure for the way the NBA treated Seattle, and Karl was treated perhaps even worse than McMillan by the Sonic braintrust. The differences between Nate and George are more than their physical appearance, though.
For one, Karl came to Seattle well versed in the vagabond nature of an NBA employee, and carried no notions of an emotional bond between a man and the city in which he is employed.
Secondly, Karl has been gone from Seattle for more than a decade, and, as they say, time has a strong ability to heal wounds.
McMillan, however, can still finger the scab from his excision from Seattle, and, as the only city he had ever known as a professional, his disappointment at being shown the door would no doubt be stronger than Karl’s.
(And, yes, I am aware that Nate was offered a contract by the Sonics and turned it down in favor of Portland’s offer. But you’re kidding yourself if you don’t think McMillan felt undervalued by the Seattle front office).
Mind you, this is not a blanket forgiveness for what McMillan said about the Sonics’ situation. As every seven-year-old can tell you, not saying anything at all will always trump negativity. Nate knows better than anyone that his beef was with the Sonics’ front office, not the city or the fans. To pretend that he felt no differently about the Sonics’ move than he did about the Vancouver Grizzlies moving to Memphis is obviously a lie. Unless he underwent a lobotomy on crossing the Columbia River, McMillan has to feel at least a twinge of sadness at knowing the Sonics no longer exist, that they’ve been replaced by something called the Thunder.
At the same time, I can understand his comments. Just as we haven’t forgotten how much Nate gave us as a player and a coach, he can’t forget how poorly – from his viewpoint – he was treated. Obviously, whatever bitterness that relocation engendered still lives on, and he’s not ready to move on.
Fair enough. That’s his right. I feel confident, though, that if 82games could somehow formulate a system which added up all the positives Nate McMillan gave this city in the course of 20 years of service, then subtracted whatever negatives he’s accrued in the four years since he left, I think it would clearly show he’s still well on the positive side of the ledger.
You see, when the hero falls, maybe the hero worshipers fall harder. … It was all the other folks who decided he must be someone else, something more.
Frank DeFord, Sports Illustrated, March 2003Labels: Nate McMillan
7 Comments:
PN, one the one hand, it does sound a little strange, but I really don't make as much out of the comment as you are making. I love Nate McMillan. He knew how to play the game and he did everything to make the team better. I don't have to tell you all his virtues as a player or a coach. But, as far as this comment goes, we probably don't have it in its full context. You don't know if Nate was just tired of being pestered about the Sonics /Thunder one too many times and he was trying to put it to rest or if he was just being "professional" or what.
Also, as a coach in the NBA, Nate is actually not free to speak his mind under pretty strict instructions from David Stern according to some sources on SonicsCentral.com. He threatened to fine and/or suspend any coach or player who spoke out against the moving of the Sonics out of Seattle (especially if they hinted at a conspiracy of some sort - I added that).
I really doubt that we'll ever hear what Nate McMillan really thinks about the situation until he is no longer an NBA coach and not employed by the NBA in any capacity or at least until David Stern is gone. But you could be right. Nate may just be bitter still over the way he was treated by ownership and insulted by the contract that they offered him. Maybe that's it. Either way, I don't think he's dogging the Sonics, but the Blazers are his concern now, not the Sonics.
- ZenDoc
I'm with you to a point, Zen. However, as I mentioned, Karl had no problem wearing a Sonic tie and making comments that reflected how sad/disgusted he was with the whole thing. Likewise, Shaq came out and made some pretty cutting comments about the move. So, obviously, there is precedence to active NBA employees making disparaging remarks about the relocation.
Second, Nate could have easily said, "I'm happy for Oklahoma City and it looks like this is a great place for the NBA. I'm sad,though, to see that the NBA isn't in Seattle as that's where I started out. I spent two decades in that city, and it's difficult for me to imagine it without a team." That way, he makes everybody happy.
Still, your point about the comments being taken out of context is spot-on. We don't know how many question he had to take from the OKC reporters (both of them) before this quote came out.
Nate should've at least said something in support of the fans of this town even if he still had a beef with the way it ended for him with the franchise. We, fans supported him from the very beginning even when he couldn't hit a jumper to save his life coming out of NCS.
I am disappointed, I do not think there is a gag order. If the gag order was placed by Stern then we certainly would've heard something already.
At a couple S.O.S. meetings we talked about the fact that there really was a gag order placed by Stern on all NBA employees, and that some players said they couldn't speak out because of that. This was before and around the time of the trial, so I don't know if that gag order was only temporary until the trial was resolved or until the Sonics were actually moved to Oklahoma or what. I have no idea if the gag order is still in effect or not. My guess is probably not, but you never want to underestimate how dirty David Stern actually is and the lengths he is willing to go to to get his way. - - ZenDoc
I don't think there's a gag order. I think most coaches and players are trained to tailor their response to whatever outlet they're speaking to. Dudes like Durant and Watson were sad about the move when they talked to the Seattle press, but then happy for a fresh start or whatever BS when they talked to the OK media.
Not to mention the outlets themselves filter what they publish. The Sacramento Bee had a nice piece on Spencer Hawes' one-man protest (green and yellow suit and Space Needle tie??) of the game against OKC, while NewsOk didn't even mention it in their one-sentence notes.
I don't see that the gag order (if there is one) has anything to do with this situation. What Nate said was pretty clear - the Sonics moving to Oklahoma meant as much or as little to him as the Grizzlies moving to Memphis. You can look at it in one of two ways:
1. He doesn't mean it, he only said it because he's bitter about the divorce
2. He means it, and he doesn't give a crap about the Seattle Sonics
Either way, there are a lot of miles between Nate and Sonics fans. The question is, does that matter to you as a Sonic fan and/or as a Nate fan?
I guess what I was saying is that Nate, like most professional athletes, gave the pat, expected, non-controversial response. I can't fault him for doing that, it's the safe route. I am disappointed he didn't take the opportunity to give Seattle a holla, but really, that's to be expected. Guys who say what they really feel or take an actual stance are rare.
Post a Comment